[First Ride] Shimano XTR 1×11 Crankset

Some weeks ago we published our first review of the new Shimano XTR 1×11 group. For that review we had been using a Race Face Next SL crankset, because the Shimano 1×11 version wasn’t ready yet. The Japanese brand explained to us that first they produced the 2×11, then the 3×11 and finally the 1×11, due to their selling figures. Today we received Shimano’s own 1×11 crankset.

What interested us the most was the tooth design, because it’s key for proper chain retention – particularly when one doesn’t use a chainguide or a bash ring. As you can see, the teeth are all the same, without the “narrow – wide” design, typical of their competitor SRAM.

The teeth are completely different from those on the Shimano 2×11 chanirings, because in that case the chain has to move between the chainrings.

Shimano XTR 2×11

Below you can see the SRAM XX1 tooth design for comparison sake.

Bolting the chainring up or changing it is really easy. All you have to do is to use the four provided nuts and tighten them in the spider. It’s refreshing that there is no need to disassemble the cranks to switch between chainrings.

On the back of the cranks you can see the 4 additional holes for the second chainring.

2×11 on the left and 1×11 on the right.

The weight is always a central topic when discussing XTR. We compared the SRAM XX1 and Shimano XTR cranks, both with a 32T chainring and their axle.

There is only a 10 gram difference but that becomes 50 if the XX1 crank is spiderless (its weight being 350 grams)

2×11 Shimano XTR: 440 grams.

The assembly is the same as all Shimano top of the line products.

First riding impression

Today, for the first time we rode the Shimano 1×11 crankset, trying to answer to the question that bothered us from the beginning: how well does the chainring tooth design work on the trail? We chose some trails with lots of roots and some fast compressions where the rear suspension gets really smashed frequently. This is where you quickly find out if the chain retention system works well.

We haven’t had any kind of problems thus far. The rear derailleur’s clutch works really well, despite the shifting becoming a little bit harsher (read more here), easing the work of the front chainring. There wasn’t a lot of mud on our ride, but this is more of a critical factor for the front derailleur shifting and not as critical to a single chainring system’s performance.

For now the XTR 1×11 system is working well, stay tuned for the long term review!

Classifica generale Winter Cup 2024
Per partecipare carica le tue attività su Training Camp

Classifica mensile dislivello

Iscriviti al canale Whatsapp di MTB Mag per non perderti mai una notizia, clicca qui!

Share

Recent Posts

[Tested] Push ELEVENSIX S-Series vs. SV Eight

Last Winter Push Industries unveiled a new shock dubbed the SV Eight. The new damper…

05/12/2024

[First Ride] Transition Sentinel V3

In July I attended the launch of a new bike which I've given very high…

23/10/2024

2024 Red Bull Rampage Venue & Competition Details Released

Virgin, Utah (September 10, 2024) – In one month’s time, the first riders will drop in for…

11/09/2024

Redbull Rampage 2024: The Complete Athlete List

Virgin, Utah (August 21, 2024) – Eighteen of the top male freeride athletes have been invited to…

21/08/2024

Forbidden Druid V2: the true Pinkbike

Those who follow the mag assiduously will have noticed that one of the mountain bikes…

29/03/2024

[Review] Roval Traverse HD Wheelset

Late this Fall and throughout an unusually warm Winter I've been spending time aboard my…

15/03/2024